<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Books and Ideas Archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Ideas from Books you may not have time to read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Books and Ideas #17: Mur Lafferty by Skeptic Zone - Episode Three &#171; Skeptic Zoners</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/books-and-ideas-17-mur-lafferty/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic Zone - Episode Three &#171; Skeptic Zoners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-756</guid>
		<description>[...] podcasts. She mentions the &#8216;Grande Dame&#8217; of podcasting, Mur Lafferty (who features on this episode of Books and Ideas) - Ginger talks about the great Australian Sci Phi show and the support from Jason Rennie - she [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] podcasts. She mentions the &#8216;Grande Dame&#8217; of podcasting, Mur Lafferty (who features on this episode of Books and Ideas) &#8211; Ginger talks about the great Australian Sci Phi show and the support from Jason Rennie &#8211; she [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writer Chris Evatt share her experiences in India by Jack Schroder</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/writer-chris-evatt-share-her-experiences-in-india/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Schroder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-753</guid>
		<description>I lost your email address in the last couple of crashes I&#039;ve had, I mean my computer has had. I hate to think you are missing my little remarks. I&#039;ve had a lotto say about Marak Hussein and John McCain. I am hanging on until Tuesday when I can vote for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost your email address in the last couple of crashes I&#8217;ve had, I mean my computer has had. I hate to think you are missing my little remarks. I&#8217;ve had a lotto say about Marak Hussein and John McCain. I am hanging on until Tuesday when I can vote for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do so many women like Sarah Palin? by gregorylent</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/sarahpalinonthebrain/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>gregorylent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-752</guid>
		<description>i prefer the yogic point of view .. people like what makes their ego feel special

so people who strongly identify with their female gender will be reinforced by palin

sam harries pov does not take into account that there are different types of people .. he thinks all brains are the same, from the get go, not understanding that the brain is a subset of consciousness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i prefer the yogic point of view .. people like what makes their ego feel special</p>
<p>so people who strongly identify with their female gender will be reinforced by palin</p>
<p>sam harries pov does not take into account that there are different types of people .. he thinks all brains are the same, from the get go, not understanding that the brain is a subset of consciousness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Books and Ideas Podcast #9: Challenging Nature with Lee M Silver by Jessica Seaton, DC</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/books-and-ideas-podcast-9-challenging-nature-with-lee-m-silver/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Seaton, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/books-and-ideas-podcast-9-challenging-nature-with-lee-m-silver/#comment-750</guid>
		<description>I have been enjoying the brain science podcasts very much. After listening to the recent ones, I am now listening to the beginning ones. This was one author who I disagreed with on several issues. I love science and appreciate the scientific method. However, I take issue when scientists say that if something can&#039;t be proven right now with our current methods and technologies, then it isn&#039;t valid. While I am not a homeopath, I find it arrogant to summarily dismiss the effects just because we don&#039;t have the tools to assess energy medicine at this point. If homeopathy seems to help some people, and doesn&#039;t make them worse or have unacceptable side-effects, I don&#039;t seem the harm. Many treatment methods, such as many surgical procedures, have also not been able to be tested in a rigorous randomized double blind study for obvious reasons. Yet no one is suggesting that surgical procedures such as bypass surgery are unwarranted. 

Mr. Silver&#039;s arrogance was again evident when he did allow that some herbal remedies may be useful. Then he went on to say, especially if we can pull out the active ingredient. The &quot;inert&quot; ingredients in an herb might have the effect of decreasing unwanted side-effects. Something we may think is inert, may have a modifying effect that we just don&#039;t have the tools to measure yet, or the modifying effect hasn&#039;t been recognized yet. 

After belittling organic food because of its origins, the author then says that organic food is no better than other food. Not all studies, but many studies do show that organic food is higher in nutrients. I&#039;ll refer you to this website: http://www.organic-center.org/science.nutri.php. Genetically engineered food may be good or bad, depending on the food. We will all agree that tomatoes engineered to be firm so that they travel well, but are tasteless is one of the poorer products. Organic farmers do not want genetically engineered seed mixed in with their crops--true. There have been cases where that has happened and the maker of the genetically engineered seed has gone after a farmer where genetically altered seed showed up and demanded license fees for the seed (http://www.mindfully.org/GE/GE3/Percy-Schmeiser-UTAustin10oct01.htm). So while Mr. Silver would like to see genetically altered food as being only a good thing, he is ignoring the financial advantages that these giant companies such as Monsanto stand to gain. Another issues with organic food does have to do with pesticides. Many people are sensitive to pesticides, and certainly for the people working in the fields they can&#039;t be healthy. 

I guess I was most disturbed by the idea that whatever man creates in the lab is going to be good. A lot is good and some is not. Certainly many life-saving drugs have been good, some have been bad. Some chemicals are good, and some, like DDT have been found to be harmful to more than just pests. We need to approach science with an open mind and a certain amount of healthy skepticism, like everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been enjoying the brain science podcasts very much. After listening to the recent ones, I am now listening to the beginning ones. This was one author who I disagreed with on several issues. I love science and appreciate the scientific method. However, I take issue when scientists say that if something can&#8217;t be proven right now with our current methods and technologies, then it isn&#8217;t valid. While I am not a homeopath, I find it arrogant to summarily dismiss the effects just because we don&#8217;t have the tools to assess energy medicine at this point. If homeopathy seems to help some people, and doesn&#8217;t make them worse or have unacceptable side-effects, I don&#8217;t seem the harm. Many treatment methods, such as many surgical procedures, have also not been able to be tested in a rigorous randomized double blind study for obvious reasons. Yet no one is suggesting that surgical procedures such as bypass surgery are unwarranted. </p>
<p>Mr. Silver&#8217;s arrogance was again evident when he did allow that some herbal remedies may be useful. Then he went on to say, especially if we can pull out the active ingredient. The &#8220;inert&#8221; ingredients in an herb might have the effect of decreasing unwanted side-effects. Something we may think is inert, may have a modifying effect that we just don&#8217;t have the tools to measure yet, or the modifying effect hasn&#8217;t been recognized yet. </p>
<p>After belittling organic food because of its origins, the author then says that organic food is no better than other food. Not all studies, but many studies do show that organic food is higher in nutrients. I&#8217;ll refer you to this website: <a href="http://www.organic-center.org/science.nutri.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.organic-center.org/science.nutri.php</a>. Genetically engineered food may be good or bad, depending on the food. We will all agree that tomatoes engineered to be firm so that they travel well, but are tasteless is one of the poorer products. Organic farmers do not want genetically engineered seed mixed in with their crops&#8211;true. There have been cases where that has happened and the maker of the genetically engineered seed has gone after a farmer where genetically altered seed showed up and demanded license fees for the seed (<a href="http://www.mindfully.org/GE/GE3/Percy-Schmeiser-UTAustin10oct01.htm)" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindfully.org/GE/GE3/Percy-Schmeiser-UTAustin10oct01.htm)</a>. So while Mr. Silver would like to see genetically altered food as being only a good thing, he is ignoring the financial advantages that these giant companies such as Monsanto stand to gain. Another issues with organic food does have to do with pesticides. Many people are sensitive to pesticides, and certainly for the people working in the fields they can&#8217;t be healthy. </p>
<p>I guess I was most disturbed by the idea that whatever man creates in the lab is going to be good. A lot is good and some is not. Certainly many life-saving drugs have been good, some have been bad. Some chemicals are good, and some, like DDT have been found to be harmful to more than just pests. We need to approach science with an open mind and a certain amount of healthy skepticism, like everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I have to take a stand against Sarah Palin by latinamericanprincesa</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/why-i-have-to-take-a-stand-against-sarah-palin/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>latinamericanprincesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that we should be picking on that small exaggeration or worry about spreading lies. I think Ensler&#039;s piece was poetic and passionate. Honestly I don&#039;t care how many animals she&#039;s shot, it&#039;s barbaric.PERIOD. That&#039;s only 1 tiny part of the whole story. Abortion, sex ed, evolution, none of that is lies. Palin is a nightmare come true. I think the 40 caribou and hundreds of wolves is a metaphor and an expression of despair at the fact that a fellow woman wants to take our right to do what we want or need with our own bodies. She takes the lives of innocent animals for fun, why not the lives of her fellow women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that we should be picking on that small exaggeration or worry about spreading lies. I think Ensler&#8217;s piece was poetic and passionate. Honestly I don&#8217;t care how many animals she&#8217;s shot, it&#8217;s barbaric.PERIOD. That&#8217;s only 1 tiny part of the whole story. Abortion, sex ed, evolution, none of that is lies. Palin is a nightmare come true. I think the 40 caribou and hundreds of wolves is a metaphor and an expression of despair at the fact that a fellow woman wants to take our right to do what we want or need with our own bodies. She takes the lives of innocent animals for fun, why not the lives of her fellow women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I have to take a stand against Sarah Palin by docartemis</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/why-i-have-to-take-a-stand-against-sarah-palin/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>docartemis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-739</guid>
		<description>Here is the link that reveals the satirical origins of the claim that Palin once shot 40 caribou:

&lt;a&gt;http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/newsquotes.asp?print=y&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Thanks to Don Rice for sending me this link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the link that reveals the satirical origins of the claim that Palin once shot 40 caribou:</p>
<p><a></a><a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/newsquotes.asp?print=y&#038;gt" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/newsquotes.asp?print=y&#038;gt</a>;</p>
<p>Thanks to Don Rice for sending me this link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I have to take a stand against Sarah Palin by docartemis</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/why-i-have-to-take-a-stand-against-sarah-palin/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>docartemis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out. However, I must say that when I went to snopes.com (I have added a link to the post above), I couldn&#039;t find anything about Palin shooting caribou or wolves.

Feel free to ad the link if you have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out. However, I must say that when I went to snopes.com (I have added a link to the post above), I couldn&#8217;t find anything about Palin shooting caribou or wolves.</p>
<p>Feel free to ad the link if you have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I have to take a stand against Sarah Palin by Don Rice</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/why-i-have-to-take-a-stand-against-sarah-palin/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-737</guid>
		<description>The truth about Sarah Palin is bad enough. Spreading lies about her only dilutes the truth. She most definitely did not shoot 40 caribou or hundreds of wolves. First check it out on snopes.com, then remove it from the above message. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth about Sarah Palin is bad enough. Spreading lies about her only dilutes the truth. She most definitely did not shoot 40 caribou or hundreds of wolves. First check it out on snopes.com, then remove it from the above message. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Books and Ideas Podcast #14: Dr. Pamela Gay from Astronomy Cast by Dr. Pamela Gay talks about the Milky Way on Brains Matter &#171; Books and Ideas with Ginger Campbell, MD</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/books-and-ideas-podcast-14-dr-pamela-gay-from-astronomy-cast/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Pamela Gay talks about the Milky Way on Brains Matter &#171; Books and Ideas with Ginger Campbell, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/books-and-ideas-podcast-14-dr-pamela-gay-from-astronomy-cast/#comment-733</guid>
		<description>[...] two arms instead of four. I recommend this episode to everyone who enjoyed Pam&#8217;s interview in Episode 14 of Books and Ideas and to all the fans of the Astronomy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two arms instead of four. I recommend this episode to everyone who enjoyed Pam&#8217;s interview in Episode 14 of Books and Ideas and to all the fans of the Astronomy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Books and Ideas Podcast #14: Dr. Pamela Gay from Astronomy Cast by scmuth</title>
		<link>http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/books-and-ideas-podcast-14-dr-pamela-gay-from-astronomy-cast/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>scmuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandideas.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/books-and-ideas-podcast-14-dr-pamela-gay-from-astronomy-cast/#comment-726</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to hear some comments on my related blog on astronomy and astrophysics.  Take a look and let me know what you think...
http://myastonomyandphysics.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to hear some comments on my related blog on astronomy and astrophysics.  Take a look and let me know what you think&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://myastonomyandphysics.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://myastonomyandphysics.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>